I was banned from DeQuest with no explanation and no response from support. So can such a resource be trusted to evaluate me as a player or user? I definitely wouldn't want that.
Need to think carefully about how you can protect users from such situations so that one day you do not lose your progress or the opportunity to improve it.
That's a good point. But if you've already earned "SBTs" from DeQuest, there's not really a way they can ban you from it. As long as the SBT is still in your wallet, your "reputation" still stands.
Yes, but for such tokens the practice of raising the level is often used and actually obtaining such a token with the subsequent loss of the possibility of its upgrade is even worse than an account ban in web2. Well, it doesn't look dangerous right now, but imagine mass usage in the future, it could become like a social ranking. Therefore, I am talking about the need to protect the user from errors and dishonest actions.
Great write-up, and I agree largely. Once SBTs tell us more about the reputation of the holder then we will see a move toward mass adoption, especially for anonymous accounts.
Soulbonds team has published a blog post "Current State of Soulbound Tokens and Reputation on Web3"
Please check it out and get more insights about the current SBTs landscape.
Mirror Blog post: https://mirror.xyz/soulbonds.eth/0QyGlZG2N_SxG7Fanck3qV87IGhza2G4s7tLeBnRuZ8
Twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/SoulbondsNFT/status/1552622085809242114
Great article! We are in Soulbonds are also working on an article related to the current SBTs landscape.
Please check our Soulbound NFTs project - continuously evolving NFTs reflecting on-chain activity in Ethereum.
Soulbonds.xyz
Thanks, will check it out!
I was banned from DeQuest with no explanation and no response from support. So can such a resource be trusted to evaluate me as a player or user? I definitely wouldn't want that.
Need to think carefully about how you can protect users from such situations so that one day you do not lose your progress or the opportunity to improve it.
That's a good point. But if you've already earned "SBTs" from DeQuest, there's not really a way they can ban you from it. As long as the SBT is still in your wallet, your "reputation" still stands.
Yes, but for such tokens the practice of raising the level is often used and actually obtaining such a token with the subsequent loss of the possibility of its upgrade is even worse than an account ban in web2. Well, it doesn't look dangerous right now, but imagine mass usage in the future, it could become like a social ranking. Therefore, I am talking about the need to protect the user from errors and dishonest actions.
Great write-up, and I agree largely. Once SBTs tell us more about the reputation of the holder then we will see a move toward mass adoption, especially for anonymous accounts.